(Toronto, July 30, 2026) While artificial intelligence (AI) holds immense promise for transforming health care for older adults, a new study published in JMIR Aging reveals significant friction between those who use AI health tools and those who create and fund them. Conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, the University of Iowa, and Washington University in St. Louis, the study highlights how key stakeholders—older adults, care partners, clinicians, health system leaders, developers, and investors—hold fundamentally different definitions of value, usability, and cost, creating systemic barriers to technology adoption.
Lead author Zhang Zhang, PhD (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Washington University in St. Louis), along with senior author Nancy L. Schoenborn, MD (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine), and a multidisciplinary team, conducted semistructured interviews with 49 key stakeholders across six distinct groups. While every group agreed that cost, usability, and value drive their decisions, their underlying priorities clashed:
These differing perspectives create distinct points of friction. End users expressed frustration over receiving AI tools that felt like “solutions in search of a problem,” pointing to developer incentives that favor adapting existing AI tools over designing around the unique needs of older adults. Meanwhile, investors and developers noted that navigating 4-to-7-year regulatory timelines and high financial risks forces them to seek massive profit margins, driving up ultimate costs for consumers.
To bridge this divide, the authors highlight actionable strategies, including early multi-stakeholder engagement, targeted public education to demystify AI for older adults, and public-private partnerships—such as the Johns Hopkins Artificial Intelligence and Technology Collaboratory (JHU-AITC) for Aging Research—to de-risk early-stage development. They conclude that, as with prior health-related technology innovations, aligning decisional priorities across stakeholders remains critical to motivating impactful AI health technologies for older adults.
About the Journal
Part of the JMIR family of journals JMIR Aging is a premier peer-reviewed, open-access journal focused on digital health, medical internet applications, and innovative technologies for aging populations.
Original article:
Zhang Z, KM Cudjoe T, Ashida S, Massare J, Chae K, Phan P, Abadir P, I Arbaje A, Unberath M, Schoenborn N. The Ways in Which Stakeholders Make Decisions About AI and Novel Technologies for the Health Care of Older Adults: Qualitative Interview Study
JMIR Aging 2026;9:e86148
URL: https://aging.jmir.org/2026/1/e86148
DOI: 10.2196/86148
About JMIR Publications
JMIR Publications is a leading open access publisher of digital health research and a champion of open science. With a focus on author advocacy and research amplification, JMIR Publications partners with researchers to advance their careers and maximize the impact of their work. As a technology organization with publishing at its core, we provide innovative tools and resources that go beyond traditional publishing, supporting researchers at every step of the dissemination process. Our portfolio features a range of peer-reviewed journals, including the renowned Journal of Medical Internet Research.
To learn more about JMIR Publications, please visit jmirpublications.com or connect with us via X , LinkedIn , YouTube , Facebook , Bluesky , and Instagram .
Head office: 130 Queens Quay East, Unit 1100, Toronto, ON, M5A 0P6 Canada
Media contact: communications@jmir.org
The content of this communication is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, published by JMIR Publications, is properly cited.
JMIR Aging
Case study
People
The Ways in Which Stakeholders Make Decisions About AI and Novel Technologies for the Health Care of Older Adults: Qualitative Interview Study
29-Jul-2026
None declared