November 19, 2024 -- A new report released from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Health and Medicine Division addresses the responsible use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research and is a call to action for biomedical research to rethink how it uses race and ethnicity. The number of people who identify as multiracial in the U.S. is increasing, yet there is no standard way to account for multiracial or multiethnic people in biomedical research, according to the final report, Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Biomedical Research.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened an expert committee in 2023 to assess the current use of racial and ethnic categories in biomedical research, review existing guidance for researchers and provide new direction for future use. The resulting report outlines nine actionable recommendations and associated resources for advancing the responsible use of race and ethnicity including ways to support community engagement.
“The committee highlighted the importance of carefully considering the use of race and ethnicity across the research process. This included examining the underlying rationale, working with community partners, ensuring inclusivity, acknowledging data limitations, and understanding the broader research context, “said Allison Aiello , James S. Jackson Healthy Longevity Professor of Epidemiology (in the Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center and director of the Program on Biosocial Aging and Health Equity, who is a co-author of the report. “This report has the potential to serve as a key guide for biomedical researchers as they consider using race and ethnicity throughout the research process.”
According to AJ Adkins Jackson, PhD, assistant professor of Epidemiology and Sociomedical Sciences at Columbia Mailman School, and whose research was cited in the report: “It is exciting when leading scientific bodies like the National Academies focus on issues like race and racism, which have structural implications for individuals and groups. Without a deep understanding of the history that fabricated our modern obsession with race, we are doomed to keep injuring our people and society with its misuse.”
Specifically the report:
Based on its review of the literature and other expert input, the committee based its conclusions and recommendations on:
“A system that approaches race and ethnicity thoughtfully and is based in evidence is within reach — now is the time to take the steps needed to achieve that goal,” said Victor J. Dzau, president of the National Academy of Medicine.
A list of co-authors and their affiliations can be found in the Report, Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Biomedical Research.
The 271-page report was supported by the Doris Duke Foundation and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
Founded in 1922, the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health pursues an agenda of research, education, and service to address the critical and complex public health issues affecting New Yorkers, the nation and the world. The Columbia Mailman School is the third largest recipient of NIH grants among schools of public health. Its nearly 300 multi-disciplinary faculty members work in more than 100 countries around the world, addressing such issues as preventing infectious and chronic diseases, environmental health, maternal and child health, health policy, climate change and health, and public health preparedness. It is a leader in public health education with more than 1,300 graduate students from 55 nations pursuing a variety of master’s and doctoral degree programs. The Columbia Mailman School is also home to numerous world-renowned research centers, including ICAP and the Center for Infection and Immunity. For more information, please visit www.mailman.columbia.edu .
Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Biomedical Research