Articles tagged with Jurisprudence
The British Antarctic Survey has selected a futuristic design for the new research station, which features modular construction and renewable energy sources. The winning design won against three other teams that presented innovative concepts for the challenging construction project on Earth.
A Queen's University study found that judges correctly identify child liars at only slightly above chance levels and perform better than law students. The research also shows that defence lawyers often ask inappropriate questions to children, leaving them at a disadvantage.
A randomized trial found that a brief psychological intervention for violent offenders had no impact on reducing alcohol consumption or re-offending rates. However, the intervention did increase participants' awareness of and motivation to address their alcohol-related issues.
A new study examines the relationship between distance and detail in human visual perception, finding that blurriness is equivalent to distance from the viewer. The research has implications for eyewitness testimony, including a case where a witness identified suspects from 450 feet away, leading to a new trial.
Richard Zare receives $100,000 Wolf Prize for his ingenious applications of laser techniques in analytical chemistry. He has developed novel methods for detecting single molecules and exploring chemical properties.
A study by University of Washington researchers finds that press coverage of lawsuits often portrays plaintiffs winning far more frequently than they do in reality. The distortion is attributed to a combination of factors, including corporate public relations campaigns and the tendency of news media to skim on scientific evidence.
Prof. Ben Feringa, Prof. Rien van Ijzendoorn, Prof. Michiel van der Klis and Prof. Jaap Sinninghe Damsté were awarded the prestigious NWO Spinoza prize for their innovative research in chemistry, education and astronomy. The winners made significant contributions to their respective fields, including the discovery of an X-ray star and ...
A new book by John Hagan provides a detailed look at the inner workings of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The book sheds light on investigations not covered by the media and highlights the key role played by Louise Arbour in setting up the tribunal's effective operations.
A new computer model developed at Ohio State University provides a detailed understanding of how municipal wells in Woburn, Massachusetts, came to be contaminated with toxic chemicals. The results suggest that the contaminants likely originated from industrial properties and flowed into the nearby Aberjona River, raising concerns about...
The NWO/Spinoza prize is awarded to Dutch researchers who rank among the world's top scientists. Four winners were recognized for their outstanding contributions in economics, history, and physics.
Bazer and Roberts identified proteins and mechanisms that regulate embryo development, fetal growth, and immune competence. Their research has clarified the biological mystery of signaling between embryo and mother to establish and maintain pregnancy in mammals.
A new study found that between 83-89% of federal appellate court decisions in employment-related ADA cases favored the defendants, with plaintiffs winning fewer than 17% of their cases on appeal. Despite this, some factors such as prevailing at trial, alleging discriminatory demotion, and specific types of impairments can improve outco...
A new study by Valerie Hans reveals that potential jurors are skeptical of people who file whiplash lawsuits, leading to doubts about the legitimacy of claims. The research found that 92% of respondents believed frivolous lawsuits are common, resulting in lower settlements and more jury trials.
According to psychologist Saul M. Kassin, modern interrogation techniques can elicit false confessions, compromising the justice system. Laboratory experiments demonstrate that innocent people can adopt false beliefs and confabulate details under suggestion.
Research funded by NSF seeks to improve jury decision-making in capital cases, where jurors may not fully comprehend instructions and legal definitions. Researchers aim to develop modifications to court procedures to help jurors make decisions more consistent with the law.