According to a peer-reviewed study published May 29, 2026 in Nutrition & Diabetes , adults with overweight or obesity (mean BMI: 33.6 kg/m²; mean age: 47.7 years) who reported continuing to eat pork while participating in a 6-month digital weight management program lost a clinically significant 5.3% of starting body weight and improved their overall diet quality scores by 4.3 points. The study was a secondary longitudinal analysis of 187 adults enrolled in the Weight Watchers digital program between January and November 2023.
The study titled, " Associations Among Pork Intake, Weight-Loss, and Diet Quality Outcomes in a Commercial Weight-Management Program ," was led by Dr. Ana M. Palacios, Assistant Professor in the Department of Health Policy and Community Health at the Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, and co-authored by researchers from Indiana University School of Public Health, WW International, Inc. (“Weight Watchers”), Georgetown University, and the University of Pennsylvania.
Participants were not assigned to eat pork, and the study did not isolate effects of individual pork foods such as bacon, ham, sausage, or lean cuts. Rather, researchers used ASA24 dietary recall data to classify participants based on reported pork intake throughout the study. Participants who continued to report pork consumption in their daily dietary recalls during the 6-month study (147 of 187 participants; 78.6%) were classified as “habitual pork consumers.”
What the Study Found
Based on dietary recall data:
Habitual pork consumers achieved clinically meaningful weight loss of 5.3% (on average) of their starting body weight, or about 10 pounds total.
Pork consumers had a positive change in diet quality measured by a Healthy Eating Index-2020 score increase of 4.3 points from 55.0 to 59.2 ( U.S. average is 58).
Ana M. Palacios, MD, PhD, the lead author of the study explains why focusing on habitual pork consumers in this program was important. She said, “The study examined pork intake because pork is widely consumed but is often perceived as inconsistent with healthy eating or weight loss. We wanted to assess whether adults who continued reporting pork intake during a structured weight-management program could still achieve clinically meaningful weight loss while improving overall diet quality.”
Key Takeaways About Weight Loss
Kristen Hicks-Roof, PhD, RDN, Sr. Director, Human Nutrition at National Pork Board commented that, “Weight management is shaped by overall dietary patterns and behaviors over time, not by one food in isolation. This study challenges those thinking pork as automatically off-limits within a healthier eating plan, since positive measures of success are documented as feasible among habitual pork consumers. Further, helping people lose weight can revolve more broadly around whether a pattern feels realistic, balanced, enjoyable and affordable enough for people to follow while still improving diet quality.”
Because this was a secondary analysis and participants were not randomized by pork intake, more direct research is needed on specific pork products, cuts, preparation methods and pairings on the plate or in the bowl as they may pertain to weight management.
This research was supported by the National Pork Board and WW International, Inc (Grant No. 39G3084).
About the National Pork Board
The National Pork Board has responsibility for Pork Checkoff-funded research, promotion and consumer information projects and for communicating with pork producers and the public. The Pork Checkoff funds national and state programs in consumer education and marketing, retail and foodservice marketing, export market promotion, production improvement, science and technology, swine health, pork safety, and environmental management and sustainability. For the past half century, the U.S. pork industry has delivered on its commitment to sustainable production and has made significant strides in reducing the environmental impact of pig farming. Through a legislative national Pork Checkoff, pork producers invest $0.35 for each $100 value of hogs sold. Importers of pork products contribute a like amount, based on a formula. For information on Checkoff-funded programs, pork producers can call the Pork Checkoff Service Center at 800-456-7675 or visit porkcheckoff.org.
Nutrition and Diabetes
Randomized controlled/clinical trial
People
Associations among pork intake, weight-loss, and diet quality outcomes in a commercial weight-management program
29-May-2026
Dr. Palacios’ institution, Georgia Southern University, and The Georgia Southern University Foundation; Indiana University, and Indiana University Foundation (the institution of Ms. Dickinson, Ms. Henschel and Ms. Parker) received funds to support this research from WW International, Inc. Drs. Cardel, Lee, and Foster were employees and/or shareholders at WW International, Inc at the time the study was conducted. Dr. Lee is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. This work was completed prior to Dr. Lee’s employment at Lilly. Dr. Lee is acting entirely on her own, and this work is not in any manner affiliated with Lilly. Dr. Cardel is an employee and shareholder of Kailera Therapeutics. This work was completed prior to Dr. Cardel’s employment at Kailera Therapeutics. Dr. Cardel is acting entirely on her own, and this work is not in any manner affiliated with Kailera Therapeutics. Dr. David Allison has received personal payments or promises for same from: Amin Talati Wasserman for KSF Acquisition Corp (Glanbia); General Mills; Kaleido Biosciences; Law Offices of Ronald Marron; Novo Nordisk Foundation; Sports Research Corp.; USDA; and Zero Longevity Science (as stock options). Donations to a foundation have been made on his behalf by the Northarvest Bean Growers Association. Dr. Allison’s institution, Indiana University, and the Indiana University Foundation have received funds or donations to support his research or educational activities from: Alliance for Potato Research and Education; American Egg Board; Arnold Ventures; Eli Lilly and Company; Mars, Inc.; National Cattlemen’s Beef Association; National Pork Board; Pfizer, Inc.; Ro; Soleno Therapeutics; USDA; WW International, Inc.); and numerous other for-profit and non-profit organizations to support the work of the School of Public Health and the university more broadly.