Add BrightSurf on Google Email

Georgetown researchers examine 21-year series of nipple sparing mastectomy cases and find no cancers

A new study by Georgetown researchers found that nipple sparing mastectomy is a safe and effective option for women with breast cancer. The procedure, which removes breast tissue while keeping the skin and nipple intact, showed no signs of cancer recurrence or development in 162 patients over 21 years.

SourceGeorgetown University Medical Center·JournalPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery·DateOct 27, 2011

Risk of breast cancer recurrence may depend on treating surgeon

A study published in Journal of the National Cancer Institute found that breast cancer recurrence rates can vary significantly based on the treating surgeon. The researchers analyzed data from over 1,000 women with ductal carcinoma in situ and discovered that positive or close margins following surgery substantially compromised disease...

SourceJournal of the National Cancer Institute·JournalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute·DateJan 3, 2011

98 percent of elective mastectomy patients would have reconstruction again, says ASPS study

A recent ASPS study found that women who have breast reconstruction after an elective mastectomy are satisfied with their decision and have low complication rates. The study revealed a 98% satisfaction rate among patients who had bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, with 100% willing to undergo the procedure again.

SourceAmerican Society of Plastic Surgeons·JournalPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery·DateJul 7, 2008

Most breast cancer surgeons don't talk to patients about reconstruction options, U-M study finds

A new study from the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center found that only a third of breast cancer patients discussed reconstruction options with their surgeon. Women who did discuss reconstruction were four times more likely to choose a mastectomy, highlighting the importance of informed decision-making in surgical choices.

Mayo Clinic measures psychological and social impacts of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM) reduce risk of future breast cancer, but may lead to negative feelings towards body appearance and loss of sense of femininity. The study found that satisfaction levels were higher in women who underwent a simple mastectomy compared to those who had bilateral prophylactic mastectomies.

SourceMayo Clinic·JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology·DateOct 24, 2005

Race a factor in breast reconstruction after mastectomy

African-American women are less likely to undergo immediate or delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy compared to Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern women. Physicians' referral patterns and patient acceptance also contribute to these racial discrepancies.

SourceWiley·JournalCancer·DateAug 23, 2004

Breast cancer risk overestimated by women, says University of Toronto study

A University of Toronto study reveals that women who undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy significantly overestimate their breast cancer risk, except for those with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The study suggests that formal genetic counselling is essential for women considering the procedure to make an informed decision.

SourceUniversity of Toronto·JournalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute·DateOct 15, 2002

Mayo Clinic study finds prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in highest-risk group of women — carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

A Mayo Clinic study found that prophylactic mastectomy reduced the risk of breast cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations by 89.5% to 100%. The study followed 26 high-risk women for 13.4 years without developing breast cancer, despite predicted risks of 6-9 cases.

SourceMayo Clinic·JournalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute·DateNov 6, 2001