Add BrightSurf on Google Email

JMIR news: Patient simulator robots, participation fraud in online research, and more

Researchers highlight the importance of human moderation and algorithmic misinformation tagging in online patient support communities and online research. Mobile apps and patient simulator robots also play a crucial role in digitizing health records and training rural clinicians for rare emergencies.

SourceJMIR Publications·JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research·TypeCommentary/editorial·DateSep 25, 2026

How Big Tech’s new health AI assistants are redefining care

The rise of consumer-facing health AI assistants is transforming healthcare access, offering users personalized medical workspaces and real-time lab result interpretation. However, concerns around data privacy and the risk of misdiagnosis highlight the need for caution in this rapidly evolving landscape.

SourceJMIR Publications·JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research·TypeCommentary/editorial·DateMay 5, 2026

Alliance study shows new promise against locally advanced lung cancer

A study by the Alliance Foundation Trials shows that combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery can help more patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergo complete cancer resection, improving their long-term health. The treatment also led to high rates of lymph node clearance and successful surgical re...

SourceAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology·JournalLung Cancer·TypeExperimental study·DateApr 20, 2026

JMIR Publications analyzes the gap between AI law and patient reality in health care

The article analyzes the legal and ethical complexities of explaining AI decisions to patients, highlighting significant hurdles such as interpretability trade-off, automation bias, and literacy barrier. It calls for co-design partnerships, institutional support, and standards for comprehension to bridge this gap.

SourceJMIR Publications·JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research·TypeCommentary/editorial·DateMar 23, 2026

From WebMD to AI chatbots: How innovation has empowered patients to take control of their health

New research highlights the transformative power of digital technology in shaping the e-patient era, enabling active participation and co-production in healthcare. Key technological innovations have built upon each other, providing patients with unprecedented tools for self-care and interaction with the healthcare system.

SourceJMIR Publications·JournalJournal of Participatory Medicine·TypeCommentary/editorial·DateJul 28, 2025

Can patient groups remain independent with drug company funding?

A new study highlights the risk of patient organizations losing independence due to funding from pharmaceutical companies. Researchers propose establishing a single database to track payments made to patient groups, doctors, and hospitals to improve transparency.

SourceUniversity of Bath·JournalInternational Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services·TypeData/statistical analysis·DateJan 2, 2025

Making mammography inclusive for patients with disabilities

Researchers advocate for accessible breast cancer screening services for individuals with disabilities, highlighting physical barriers such as equipment accessibility and fragrance-free policies. They stress the need for social and procedural barriers removal through comprehensive training and resources.

SourceElsevier·JournalJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences·TypeCommentary/editorial·DateSep 12, 2023

Inequities, research gaps in ophthalmology

A review of 75 publications found significant knowledge gaps on health inequities affecting the LGBTQ+ community and minority groups, including American Indian and Alaska Native individuals. The study emphasizes the importance of investigating barriers to clinical studies and medical trainee recruitment in under-resourced areas.

SourceJAMA Network·JournalJAMA Ophthalmology·DateDec 8, 2022

Whether it’s medical records, blood or tissue, patients want to know if researchers may use something from them

A new study suggests that members of the public want to know if their health information or samples from their bodies will be used in research or to help develop new biomedical products. The study found that patients are more likely to want notification about research use of their health information than biospecimens.

SourceMichigan Medicine - University of Michigan·JournalJAMA·TypeSurvey·DateAug 9, 2022

Health experts fear impact of deteriorating hostile environment

A group of experts describe a decade of destitution and ill-health caused by the UK's hostile environment policies. The NHS employs teams that target vulnerable patients, delaying or withholding care, while thousands are wrongly turned away from services.

SourceSAGE·JournalJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine·TypeSystematic review·DateFeb 8, 2022

Research finds patients and providers differ in opinions about immediate access to medical records

A recent survey found that while most clinicians and patients agree that transparency is essential, providers are concerned about added stress for patients due to complex reports. Patients want providers to contact them within 24 hours of abnormal results, but clinicians struggle with managing time and navigating data.

SourceUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus·JournalThe American Journal of Surgery·TypeSurvey·DateJan 21, 2022

Antibiotics for appendicitis: CODA study findings finalized

The Comparing Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial found that nearly 7 in 10 patients with antibiotics avoided an appendectomy within three months. By four years, just under 50% had the surgery, suggesting both treatments are safe and valuable to patients differently based on unique symptoms and circumstances.

SourceUniversity of Washington School of Medicine/UW Medicine·JournalNew England Journal of Medicine·TypeRandomized controlled/clinical trial·DateOct 25, 2021

World-leading pharma collaborates call for plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal articles

Pharmaceutical companies in the Open Pharma collaboration recommend developing plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical research articles. The summaries should be understandable, unbiased, non-promotional, and easily accessible. This move aims to make medical publishing more open and inclusive for all audiences.

SourceTaylor & Francis Group·JournalCurrent Medical Research and Opinion·TypeCommentary/editorial·DateSep 12, 2021