Articles tagged with Citation Analysis
A study analyzing 1000 biomedical articles found that almost 1 in 5 'recent' references are at least 10 years old, suggesting the term is used more as a narrative device than a measure of time. Citation patterns varied across medical specialties, with some fields citing older references than others.
A new study found that nearly 1 in 5 citations generated by GPT-4o were entirely fabricated, while over two-thirds contained errors, indicating a major reliability issue. Researchers and journals must implement stronger safeguards to validate accuracy and authenticity.
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center has published 117 research articles in high-impact journals, with a focus on oncology and clinical sciences. The institution's collaboration with domestic and international partners demonstrates its commitment to advancing health through discovery and innovation.
A new AI tool has identified over 1,000 'questionable' scientific journals, including those that charge hundreds or thousands of dollars to publish research without proper vetting. The AI system uses six criteria to evaluate journals, including editorial board composition and website quality.
A new analysis of data on scientists with exceptional early-career success identified common characteristics, including affiliation with institutions in less developed countries and work in specific fields. These findings could aid efforts to distinguish stellar talent from problematic behaviors.
A new study uncovers coordinated efforts of paper mills, brokers, and infiltrated journals to fabricate research, pay for authorships, and citations. Millions of dollars are involved in these processes, with the problem so widespread that it's outpacing legitimate scientific publications.
The journal has achieved a Scopus CiteScore of 5.5 and ranks in Q1 for both Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics categories. Its first Journal Impact Factor at 2.5 highlights its impact and relevance to the academic community.
A University of Queensland study reveals that non-English language papers on bird, mammal, and amphibian protection have significantly fewer citations than their English-language counterparts. Providing an English abstract can boost citations by 1.5 times.
Four ORNL researchers were recognized as Highly Cited Researchers for their impact factor using data from the Web of Science. They exemplify excellence in science and collaboration, advancing their respective fields.
The open-access journal Seed Biology has been successfully indexed in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) in the Web of Science. This milestone strengthens the journal's academic discourse and impact, making its articles searchable and citable worldwide.
Luke McCormack, a Tree Root Biologist at The Morton Arboretum, has been recognized as one of the most cited and influential researchers worldwide. He leads the Root Biology Lab, examining root strategies to help trees cope with waterlogging and drought stress.
The gender gap among top-cited scientists is narrowing, with women now representing 32% of top-cited authors in certain fields, according to a study analyzing 5.8 million international scientific authors. However, significant disparities remain, and efforts to address promotion pathways for gifted female researchers are still needed.
Researchers found that academic emigration rates decrease with economic development until a certain GDP threshold, then increase. This challenges the assumption that economic growth leads to brain drain in low- and middle-income countries.
The pandemic saw an increase in productivity for all astronomers, but women lagged behind, with fewer papers published than men. Despite this, some countries experienced equal productivity rates before the pandemic, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address gender disparities.
A new study suggests China has surpassed the US in one key measure of national research success. Using a different measurement method than traditional methods, researchers found that Chinese research ranked as high as or higher than US work in the top 1% of scientific studies in 2019.
A team analysis of 24 million research articles and 3.9 million US patents reveals that teams tend to have more significant impacts on citations compared to individual researchers. The study found that the advantage decreases as team members' individual citation rates diverge.
The journal has been included in the Social Science Citation Index due to its exceptional awareness of current issues affecting the field of management accounting. Management Accounting Research features original research, case studies, and empirical work on topics such as management change, risk management, and corporate governance.