Articles tagged with Rhetoric
A new study finds that personal attacks in politics are strongly associated with greater media coverage, but show no correlation with fundraising or policy success. Researchers discovered an asymmetric pattern of conflict entrepreneurs, who use antagonistic rhetoric to gain media attention and become 'media celebrities'.
The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) has been recognized for its successful initiatives promoting cultural humility and community connections. The First 5 Minutes: Cultural Humility training modules equip healthcare providers with tools to foster respect and empathy in patient interactions.
The study analyzed eight million congressional speeches, finding a significant decline in fact-based language and an increase in intuition-based rhetoric. This shift has been linked to decreased legislative productivity and growing economic inequality.
The study introduces a groundbreaking classification of narrative map rhetoric into two primary categories: semantic rhetoric and structural rhetoric. The proposed framework addresses conceptualizations, categories, and working mechanisms, offering substantial theoretical advancements for contemporary cartography.
Researchers found violent political rhetoric (VPR) linked to increased US suicide rates, with vulnerable groups like LGBTQ+ individuals at highest risk. Vicarious trauma through news coverage can also exacerbate mental health challenges.
A study of 2,001 American adults found that cryptocurrency ownership is associated with belief in conspiracy theories, support for political extremism, and the 'Dark Tetrad' of personality traits. Fringe social media sources are also a key predictor of crypto ownership.
Stigmatization increases stress, causing physical and mental health problems such as heart disease, anxiety, and depression. Doctors must be aware of these impacts and work to create welcoming healthcare environments for immigrant patients.
A study by Dr Francesco Rigoli found that right-wing supporters tend to evaluate the past as more positive than left-wingers, while left-wingers are more optimistic about the future. This effect is observed across various countries, including the USA, UK, Italy, South Africa, Mexico, and Poland.
A new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that exposure to norm-violating rhetoric from politicians like Donald Trump can reduce support for certain core democratic principles. The researchers found that Trump supporters who were shown his antidemocratic tweets indicated less support for partici...
A recent study found that the police murder of George Floyd led to a three-week spike in firearm assaults on U.S. police officers, but this trend quickly subsided. The researchers caution against using the term 'war on cops' and instead suggest focusing on evidence-based solutions to reduce violence.
Research shows that nationalist nostalgia is a key rhetorical tool for the radical right, emphasizing a superior past and linking it to issues like immigration and economic decline. This type of nostalgia can be exclusionary and polarizing, targeting migrants and oversimplifying complex social problems.
Two researchers argue that hyperpartisanship has led to a decline in political apologies, making it difficult for politicians to acknowledge wrongdoing and seek redemption. This shift away from apology is attributed to the influence of social media and partisan echo chambers, which reward silence over accountability.
A University of Utah-led study found a surge in anti-Asian hate language on Twitter between January and March 2020, with clusters of hateful tweets spreading across the US. The researchers identified 15 geographic regions where anti-Asian hate was statistically higher than expected.
An expert analysis of Russia's foreign policy statements since the USSR collapse finds Putin masking invasion policies with 1990s humanitarian propaganda. The study highlights how the Kremlin has used narratives from the 1990s to claim Russian minorities need protecting with military support.
A study found that uncivil tweet replies to congresswomen of color doubled after Trump's initial derogatory remarks. The majority of replies contained stereotypes and threats, with a chilling effect on women who might speak out or run for office.
New research found that Black Lives Matter protests led to a surge in online searches for anti-racist terms and topics, with spikes in searches continuing even after the initial protests. The study also showed that these increased search volumes were correlated with higher daily visits to Wikipedia pages on related topics.
The UK's new visa for Hong Kongers is framed as a haven for Britain's former colonial subjects, but Professor Michaela Benson warns of 'undoubtedly colonialist overtones'. The visa scheme has been criticized for its selective nature and perceived biases towards certain migrants.
A new study suggests that China's policies in Xinjiang, including enforced birth control and internment camps, could result in a significant loss of life among the Uyghur population. The research estimates that up to 4.5 million lives could be lost by 2040 if current policies continue.
Researchers found that candidates' pro-gun messages and NRA funding influence voters' evaluations, with racial resentment moderating the effects. Voters who own guns or are racially resentful were more likely to support candidates with similar views, while those low in racial resentment preferred pro-gun control candidates.
A new study by A. Burcu Bayram and Catarina Thomson found that international aid institutions should not be worried about the impact of populism on global development cooperation. Those wanting to convince the public about foreign aid should focus on transparent communication and local partnerships.
The study analyzed two million parliamentary speeches in the UK and Ireland, finding that politicians use emotive language more in high-profile debates like PMQs to attract a wider audience. In low-profile debates, emotional rhetoric is less pronounced as politicians mostly address colleagues.
High-level government officials and influential commentators in the US trivialized pandemic casualties by adopting a tone that suggested premature death was normal. This misleading rhetoric ignored the collective costs of unchecked disease transmission and offered false reassurance about the risk of infection.
A study by University of Oregon researchers found strong support for face coverings on US Twitter, with a majority of users supporting mask-wearing. Media coverage of anti-mask sentiments fueled the rhetoric of those opposed, but the majority of users ignored this rhetoric and instead supported mask-wearing.
Researchers found that increased anti-immigrant rhetoric during the 2016 presidential campaign led to a significant increase in healthcare services usage among undocumented patients. The study suggests that this association may be attributed to decreased trust and increased stress related to immigration policies.
Researchers analyzed 10 months of campaign emails to find varied strategies and goals, with the Clinton campaign making a surprising decision to stop emailing inactive supporters. Trump campaign e-mails were more participatory, while Clinton sent eight emails a week to active supporters at peak.
New research suggests that conspiracy beliefs can lead to more willingness for non-normative political actions, such as illegally blocking public entryways. In contrast, those who accept a low-conspiracy worldview are more likely to engage in typical political activities like voting and participating in rallies. The study's findings ha...
Researchers at University of Texas at Austin and University of Minnesota debunked the myth of a correlation between Super Bowls and sex trafficking, citing empirical evidence that shows no causal link. A study found that online ads for sex may temporarily increase during large public events, but this is not the same as trafficking.
A UCSF study found that anti-immigrant rhetoric from the White House harms Latino patients' perceptions of safety and access to emergency care, with 75% of undocumented immigrants feeling unsafe. The study also showed that patients were afraid to come to the ED for care, delaying treatment by two days on average.
A survey found that many white Americans assume immigrants from certain countries are 'illegal' due to stereotypes and lack of documentation, leading to discriminatory treatment. The study highlights the impact of social perceptions on immigrant standing in American society, revealing a new source of ethnic-based inequalities.
Italian researchers found that Tea Party supporters exhibited greater racial resentment towards non-white individuals and relied on it when evaluating Obama. The study suggests the Tea Party movement paved the way for mainstream acceptance of racially hostile content, contributing to Trump's communication strategy.
Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Doron Taussig analyze Trump's rhetoric, finding it both disrupted political norms and created challenges for governing. Trump's signature traits include spontaneity, accountability dodging, and demonization, which have led to concerns about his mental acuity and speculation about invoking the 25th Amendment.
Researchers found that using violent language in politics excites one's base but polarizes others, with a 20% increase in polarization. The study suggests micro-targeting and careful language use can help reduce polarization and promote unity.
Researchers analyzed TV debate transcripts to quantify dramatic differences in speaking styles among candidates. Donald Trump's style was characterized by simplicity, short sentences, and a reduced vocabulary, differing from other candidates' more complex communication methods.
Experts argue that authoritarian leaders effectively mobilize public support using discourse that aligns with the country's history and traditions. The study analyzes Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan's presidents' rhetoric between 1997-2015.
Researchers found that the September 11 attacks merged immigration and terrorism issues, heightening surveillance and racializing Latino immigrants as a threat. This merger fueled Islamophobia and led to increased deportations, with an average of 334,000 people deported per year since 2003.
A new study has examined International Monetary Fund policies over three decades and found that the IMF has increased structural adjustment conditions to pre-crisis levels. The researchers argue that the IMF's 'reforms' are superficial and do not address the root causes of economic instability in borrowing countries.
Research by Michigan State University's Saleem Alhabash suggests that adding a religious message to an anti-alcohol warning does not discourage viewers from drinking. Gain-framed messages, which focus on benefits, are more effective than loss-framed messages in this context.
A new study compares Nixon's health plans with Obamacare, revealing that while both aimed to provide coverage for the uninsured, Nixon's proposals were more 'liberal' and preserved the insurance industry's role. The ACA faced intense opposition, with some Democrats initially rejecting it as too moderate.
A BYU business study found that using violent language by CEOs can lead to unethical behavior among rival employees, but not when the CEO uses such language with their own team. The research highlights the impact of leadership rhetoric on employee ethics and encourages CEOs to reconsider their communication strategies.
A recent study by Michigan State University's Corwin Smidt found that news coverage of Washington politicians' rhetoric has limited influence on public opinion. Instead, citizens are swayed by stories about grassroots protests and local events.
Researchers found that weak supporting evidence can make people less likely to believe in an outcome, even if they have no evidence at all. This effect, known as the 'weak evidence effect,' influences professional persuaders and public perceptions of policy.
A new study by University of Missouri researchers found that well-informed citizens are less swayed by White House rhetoric, while the general public is more susceptible to manipulation. Simple and compelling language used by presidents can significantly increase public support for military actions overseas.
Researchers found that uninformed voters respond to abstract messages when voting far in the future, while concrete messages sway them when the choice is near. This effect applies to various consumption contexts like college decisions or car purchases.
A study by University of Minnesota researcher Akshay Rao found that the timing and content of political messages affect voters, with abstract concepts gaining traction in distant future elections. As election dates approach, voters prioritize concrete details over broad ideas.
The UK's National Health Service (NHS) is turning 60, but its future is uncertain due to a lack of scientific focus on health-system reform. The Editorial calls for a radical change in the NHS's training system and culture to address its fundamental problems.
Researchers found that negative economic news can significantly boost a president's approval ratings, even if their foreign policy is stellar. The power of negative reporting about the economy was demonstrated during President George H.W. Bush's administration.
A University of Georgia professor argues that President Clinton's ability to craft messages appealing to different audiences may be his greatest asset in the upcoming impeachment hearings. His expertise in public speaking, like a skilled musician playing a familiar tune, makes his messages uniquely effective.